How about post-traumatic disorder? Is that really necessary like this:  “ ..to 
think,  remember, imagine a feeling at all is to feel it.”? 


kindly markku




Lähetetty laitteesta Windowsin sähköposti





Lähettäjä: Benjamin Udell
Lähetetty: ‎tiistai‎, ‎2‎. ‎joulukuuta‎ ‎2014 ‎20‎:‎41
Vast.ott: [email protected], [email protected]





John D., lists,


Thanks for quoting it. I hadn't remembered this distinction between feeling and 
sensation. Earlier in the same manuscript (titled "Forms of Consciousness" by 
the editors, who guess it to be from about 1900), in CP 7.543, Peirce also says 
that sensation involves both feeling and the consciousness of one's being 
compelled, and that a sensation is an event which has to happen at a particular 
moment. He points out that to remember or imagine a sensation is not the same 
as actually having that sensation, and says that, on the other hand, to think, 
remember, imagine a feeling at all is to feel it.


Best, Ben


On 12/2/2014 12:53 PM, Deely, John N. wrote:


Here is the undated CP 7.551 passage:

Undated CP 7.551. There are no other forms of consciousness except the three 
that have been mentioned, Feeling, Altersense, and Medisense. They form a sort 
of system. Feeling is the momentarily present contents of consciousness taken 
in its pristine simplicity, apart from anything else. It is consciousness in 
its first state, and might be called primisense. Altersense is the 
consciousness of a directly present other or second, withstanding us. Medisense 
is the consciousness of a thirdness, or medium between primisense and 
altersense, leading from the former to the latter. It is the consciousness of a 
process of bringing to mind. Feeling, or primisense , is the consciousness of 
firstness; altersense is consciousness of otherness or secondness; medisense is 
the consciousness of means or thirdness. Of primisense there is but one 
fundamental mode. Altersense has two modes, Sensation and Will. Medisense has 
three modes, Abstraction, Suggestion, Association.†16 (see further 7.276–278). 

From: Helmut Raulien 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:39
To: [email protected]
Subject: [biosemiotics:7647] Re: Peirce categories 


Dear Edwina, List,

I think, a good text is CP.7551. I only found it in google books, and couldnt 
copy it. Catchwords are "primisense, altersense, medisense".

Best, Helmut

Edwina Taborsky wrote:


Ben - just a minor quibble. With Firstness, you don't get a 'feeling of red'; 
you get a Feeling. To identify that feeling, even as 'red', moves you into 
Secondness and Thirdness.

Edwina
----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin Udell 
To: <[email protected] >; <[email protected] >
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:00 PM
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:7629] Re: Peirce categories 

Stan, lists,
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to