Accepting mystery is saying I don't know when it comes to questions about prime movers and such. It is not saying there was nothing before the cosmos. Or there is no edge to the cosmos. Or there is no other cosmos. All statements that could be imagined or surmised without denying the mystery. We should be aware that if we take these statements as proved, we are more than likely veering in the direction of nominalism. To which triadic philosophy says, Thinking does not make it so.
Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
