Interesting, Jerry. The Scottish Common Sense philosophers (Thomas Reid and his 
followers) were Boscovichians, but they thought just that atoms were very 
small, not points, since one could not confirm they were points, but they acted 
like points, being very small. They were quite influential on many later 
developments in Empiricism. The table also misses Thomas Hobbes, whose 
political philosophy was based entirely on an atheistic atomism.



Lucretius, interestingly, proposed evolution by natural selection, which he 
thought was a corollary to his atomism. I think that Peirce's evolutionary 
views and his views on continuity are more in line with Boscovich, as you 
suggest Jerry. I didn't know that Peirce followed Boscovich, but it makes sense.



John



-----Original Message-----

From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: March 25, 2015 3:58 PM

To: Peirce List

Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Philosophies of Atomic Theory



List:



This website:



http://www.eoht.info/page/Atomic+theory





gives a short survey of atomism, from classic Greek philosophy to modern times, 
including its relation to sub-atomic physics.  The stages of development of 
philosophical thought about the nature of matter are presented diagrammatically 
over various periods of thought.



One can place CSP's scientific views in the contexts of his times, a topic I 
have mentioned on several occasions.



Many students of CSP could find this useful for evaluating various CSP's text.  
In particular, note that CSP was a follower of Boscovich.



Cheers



Jerry






John Collier, Philosophy, UKZN, Durban 4041
http://web.ncf.ca/collier



-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to