Okay, that didn't work. I'll try copying and pasting the text into a new email. - Best, Ben U.

Okay, I'll try re-sending this without the word "Hitler" in the title. Maybe some of our email accounts block those from being sent! That would be crazy but I don't have a better guess at the moment. - Best, Ben U.

On 7/8/2015 9:48 AM, Benjamin Udell wrote:

Ben N., all,

Those PDFs are huge. I'd recommend right-clicking on the download of the pdf, in order to save it to some familiar folder on one's computer and open it from there.

I haven't received Mara's reply to you (if it was sent to peirce-l at all) and I don't see it at the IU peirce-l archive https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2015-07/ . Nor do I see there the reply to that I sent to peirce-l an hour ago. Here is what I wrote in it:

    In replying on-list to a peirce-l post, click on "*Reply all*",
    so that peirce-l will be included among the intended recipients.
    I use Thunderbird for emails and it offers me another choice -
    "Reply list" - which replies only to the list.

    Yesterday I found that I had not received some of your recent
    posts - I saw your posts in others' replies to them. I went
    online and found your posts and a few others in my email
    account's spam folder.  The spam guard was triggered by some
    string of characters I guess, I don't know what. Anyway I marked
    your emails "not spam" and now I've received your email of today
    without a problem.

    It may be that some other people's email programs thought that
    your posts were spam too.

I'm beginning to think that peirce-l's IU server has a spam guard that is being triggered by some of this emails. I can't figure out why. It might even be the word "Hitler", although that doesn't explain why some of the emails do get through.

Well, let's see whether this post gets through. I'll also email it to you (Ben N.) individually.

Best,
Ben U.

On 7/8/2015 9:31 AM, Ben Novak wrote:

Dear All:

Yes, Mara is right: a pdf copy of my dissertation is available on the internet

I took Mara's advice to go to:

http://access.cjh.org/home.php?type=extid&term=1055795#1

...and click all the "continues" as they appear, and then wait for quite a while. Eventually the pdf loads, and it is possible to read the dissertation.

The dissertation contains many clerical and other errors, most of which have been corrected for the book. Also, there are a few additions to the text, including a new final chapter.

However, for the purpose of reviewing my explication and application of Peirce's logic, everything essential is present in the dissertation available at the above site in pdf.

Ben

*Ben Novak <http://bennovak.net> *
5129 Taylor Drive, Ave Maria, FL 34142
Telephones:
Magic Jack: (717) 826-5224/*Best to call and leave messages.* /
Landline: 239-455-4200 */My brother's main phone line./ *
Mobile (202) 509-2655*/I use this only on trips--and in any event messages arrive days late./ *
Skype: BenNovak2

/"All art is mortal, not merely the individual artifacts, but the arts themselves. One day the last portrait of Rembrandt and the last bar of Mozart will have ceased to be — though possibly a colored canvas and a sheet of notes may remain — because the last eye and the last ear accessible to their message will have gone."/ Oswald Spengler

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Ben Novak <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Dear All:

Thanks to all of you for responding to my email introduction.

It seems that most responses are being emailed to me directly, and that therefore this discussion is not appearing in the discussion forum for others to read. Am I correct in this? Further, I have been replying to different emails simply by clicking reply, but I think that this means that others see neither the original email to me nor the reply.

If so, I was hoping to get a discussion of the application of adductive logic in real life situations, and to receive some feedback from others in the forum who may not be initially interested in thee subject, but might be pulled into it as a result of the discussion.

I truly would like to know how Peirce-ians evaluate my handling of this logic in the book.

For this purpose, does anyone know how to create a thread within the forum to that everyone else in the forum can see the discussion?

Ben

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to