[image: ACADEMIA] [image: Kalevi] Semiosis stems from logical incompatibility in organic nature <https://www.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14933604/Semiosis_stems_from_logical_incompatibility_in_organic_nature> by Kalevi Kull <https://ut-ee.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/KaleviKull> *We suggest here a model of the origin of the phenomenal world via the naturalization of logical conflict or incompatibility (which is broader than, but includes logical contradiction). Physics rules out the reality of meaning because of the method of formalization, which requires that logical conflicts cannot be part of the model. We argue that (a) meaning-making requires a logical conflict; (b) logical conflict assumes a phenomenal present; (c) phenomenological specious present occurs in living systems as widely as meaning-making; (d) it is possible to provide a physiological description...* Download <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/RlZ4aWcyRUhlWmdOeTV6bXc4ZDI1Vnl4TjArOUxsT1NoTjlTVFFMNEdyQT0tLXJ0SDN5Y0V4UzBGcXpaQ3dlaE5Yb3c9PQ==--94e30f264f9a5935168e9a74f5569c18d3c80a91/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14933604/Semiosis_stems_from_logical_incompatibility_in_organic_nature?auto=download&campaign=weekly_digest> Bookmark <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/eE93c0lqaXhuSzh5Nk9RZ3dhS2JlS2plMnlUNWRDZ0Iwd0tRZGVMU2ZMZz0tLUJsd2g0dDZlaGhBMlNOb2pLZ1ZLeVE9PQ==--302b9c1d5f706884f283557803d6848ebce2d9dd/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14933604/Semiosis_stems_from_logical_incompatibility_in_organic_nature?auto=bookmark&campaign=weekly_digest>[image: Francesco] The Iconic Moment. Towards a Peircean Theory of Diagrammatic Imagination <https://www.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14812933/The_Iconic_Moment._Towards_a_Peircean_Theory_of_Diagrammatic_Imagination> by Francesco Bellucci <https://ttu-ee.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/FrancescoBellucci> and Ahti-veikko Pietarinen <https://ttu-ee.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/AhtiveikkoPietarinen> | Bookmarked by Joao Queiroz <https://ufjf.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/joaoqueiroz> *Einstein famously said, “Imagination is more important than knowledge”. But how to study imagination and how to represent and communicate what the content of imagination may be in the context of scientific discovery? In 1908 Peirce stated that deduction consists of “two sub-stages”, logical analysis and mathematical reasoning. Mathematical reasoning is again divisible into “corollarial and theorematic reasoning”, the latter concerning an invention of a new icon, or “imaginary object diagram”, while the former results from “previous logical analyses and mathematically reasoned conclusions”....* Download <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/bmg3eFlrYnIvS0ZET0VwRGh5RU5Ocks1Z0VjYXIrZlZxUDlmUjM3NjhnYz0tLVFJS1I3VTlueXNGVVU0TkorNmxtTkE9PQ==--058c5290f8c01c37bd19d8565bb8f016ebad45c4/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14812933/The_Iconic_Moment._Towards_a_Peircean_Theory_of_Diagrammatic_Imagination?auto=download&campaign=weekly_digest> Bookmark <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/QzRnS09jell1cWNtSVJxQXg1Sm50VHE0ZzlhT0pLaWl2K0k5Rlp1cmo5UT0tLXd3REN5SFlTaGRTTWlWWEhUcnoxUXc9PQ==--9189c51585c9eb0979ae0eeb71471491e9754c43/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14812933/The_Iconic_Moment._Towards_a_Peircean_Theory_of_Diagrammatic_Imagination?auto=bookmark&campaign=weekly_digest>[image: Francesco] New Light on Peirce’s Conceptions of Retroduction, Deduction, and Scientific Reasoning <https://www.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/11842939/New_Light_on_Peirce_s_Conceptions_of_Retroduction_Deduction_and_Scientific_Reasoning> by Francesco Bellucci <https://ttu-ee.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/FrancescoBellucci> and Ahti-veikko Pietarinen <https://ttu-ee.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/AhtiveikkoPietarinen> | Bookmarked by Joao Queiroz <https://ufjf.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/joaoqueiroz> *We examine Charles Peirce’s mature views on the logic of science, especially as contained in his later and still mostly unpublished writings (1907-1914). We focus on two main issues. The first concerns Peirce’s late conception of retroduction. Peirce conceived inquiry as performed in three stages which correspond to three classes of inferences: abduction or retroduction, deduction, and induction. The question of the logical form of retroduction, of its logical justification, and of its methodology stand out as the three major threads in his later writings. The other issue concerns the...* Download <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/SHZXTXdxYWc0akZTaHZsUWZ6Z2w2NHpSc3JGMHRvaGQzOHFGQnl5dkdCMD0tLW05R2cyOElFekxpcmFsMFY0ZDdrOFE9PQ==--d1bd58251a49399d3271456e4a7c4c37f2fcde3a/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/11842939/New_Light_on_Peirce_s_Conceptions_of_Retroduction_Deduction_and_Scientific_Reasoning?auto=download&campaign=weekly_digest> Bookmark <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/WS85dWNHR0ttL05QaU5xOWt1VHJ2STJqd3FnS2E5Z1pPU2xJdjBpckVzND0tLUVpd1ZWaGRoN0hiQ0kwQ2lDVzRHc0E9PQ==--da23575d6b52d212969fea058118d901187bcae9/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/11842939/New_Light_on_Peirce_s_Conceptions_of_Retroduction_Deduction_and_Scientific_Reasoning?auto=bookmark&campaign=weekly_digest>[image: Francesco] Exploring Peirce’s Speculative Grammar. The Immediate Object of a Sign. <https://www.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14426822/Exploring_Peirce_s_Speculative_Grammar._The_Immediate_Object_of_a_Sign> by Francesco Bellucci <https://ttu-ee.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/FrancescoBellucci> | Bookmarked by Joao Queiroz <https://ufjf.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/joaoqueiroz> *The paper argues against what I call the “Fregean interpretation” of Peirce’s distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce’s dynamic object is akin to Frege’s Bedeutung, while Peirce’s immediate object is akin to Frege’s Sinn. After having exposed the Fregean interpretation, I briefly reconstruct the genesis of Peirce’s notion of immediate object in his semiotic writings of the years 1904-1909 and defend the view that, according to Peirce, only propositions have immediate objects.* Download <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/d1pTdXZBeElLNHVLL0NOdm0rZ3Y1L1V6dTd2Zk1MMEJSamxFanQ2VHdwcz0tLWJqQyszUVhkWFlLRkp0blNydWhJS1E9PQ==--975420bb1689e5ced20f52f9298a5911abee3430/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14426822/Exploring_Peirce_s_Speculative_Grammar._The_Immediate_Object_of_a_Sign?auto=download&campaign=weekly_digest> Bookmark <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/TlQ1M2hqaDMwK2p3U0hxRFk1QjZPSTRxb2RVZ3VObmxxL1F2TTNDb2Z5UT0tLUwxdURkRk9aMlRNbVpMMzloL3A5SHc9PQ==--59342a4f55e2875a7ecf3942905149967d8c45d0/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/14426822/Exploring_Peirce_s_Speculative_Grammar._The_Immediate_Object_of_a_Sign?auto=bookmark&campaign=weekly_digest>[image: Francesco] Diagrammatic Reasoning. Some notes on C. S. Peirce and F. A. Lange <https://www.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/11562363/Diagrammatic_Reasoning._Some_notes_on_C._S._Peirce_and_F._A._Lange> by Francesco Bellucci <https://ttu-ee.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/FrancescoBellucci> | Bookmarked by Joao Queiroz <https://ufjf.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/joaoqueiroz> *According to the received view, Charles S. Peirce’s theory of diagrammatic reasoning is derived from Kant’s philosophy of mathematics. For Kant, only mathematics is constructive/synthetic, logic being instead discursive/analytic, while for Peirce, the entire domain of necessary reasoning, comprising mathematics and deductive logic, is diagrammatic, i.e. constructive in the Kantian sense. This shift was stimulated, as Peirce him- self acknowledged, by the doctrines contained in Friedrich Albert Lange’s Logische Studien (1877). The present paper reconstructs Peirce’s reading of Lange’s book,...* Download <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/Z2hKRER6dHJmQVFmYXJjU2poY3BBT09sbGkyNENzcE13ZDh1OC9Ba05Paz0tLUtBa2VzdVJUNEFuZlY4SG56NlNTd3c9PQ==--732aacc9567914d76c4fab9945a1119d95f7f0fd/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/11562363/Diagrammatic_Reasoning._Some_notes_on_C._S._Peirce_and_F._A._Lange?auto=download&campaign=weekly_digest> Bookmark <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/bEpselVMZDRVcWhyOE4zV3BoeXVPK09uUitxeVpkbEFyd0RBa2ZjZkVwQT0tLUREM0dsTzdkRnFDVFlaWjlLVlBQbXc9PQ==--c45efdce2546a7039b0b7dac38814043308e3cef/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/11562363/Diagrammatic_Reasoning._Some_notes_on_C._S._Peirce_and_F._A._Lange?auto=bookmark&campaign=weekly_digest>[image: Ross] Routinely armed and unarmed police: what can the Scandinavian experience teach us? <https://www.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/6290307/Routinely_armed_and_unarmed_police_what_can_the_Scandinavian_experience_teach_us> by Ross Hendy <https://cambridge.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/RossHendy> | Bookmarked by James Richardson <https://workered.academia.edu/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/JamesRichardson> *This article introduces the author’s recent study on the ‘strategic impact’ of routinely arming the New Zealand Police and discusses how two significant research findings are consistent with published theory. First, the utility of taking a binary, black and white approach when analysing the ‘routinely armed versus routinely unarmed’ debate, is limited in terms of considering police officer behaviour. This is because police departmental policies shape police officer risk-taking and behaviour to a considerable degree. Second, despite departmental policies, the routine armament of a routinely...* Download <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/cUliTFB3K0NrTGJwbUxaNUtsQzZXSXlrTzdnUW90NGRmM2FOak54azN3Yz0tLTBzZWJJbHhHWDNZa0R6eU1wSlFqMUE9PQ==--97cb12cf28c8a546b34a03f1bb215cbac1adde11/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/6290307/Routinely_armed_and_unarmed_police_what_can_the_Scandinavian_experience_teach_us?auto=download&campaign=weekly_digest> Bookmark <https://www.academia.edu/keypass/bENZQXAwUXJNNHhxUnNtOEhSYngwaVdwS0ZGQ2JreTNTQW5zM1JmMms3Yz0tLXFIUkgvalRuOUUzU3BQczQ4ZGhJVkE9PQ==--e3ecb7239de1f008bf480a22e4229974ba22e3b4/t/a-KirZaun-bpUuEo/6290307/Routinely_armed_and_unarmed_police_what_can_the_Scandinavian_experience_teach_us?auto=bookmark&campaign=weekly_digest> [image: Gary Richmond]
*Gary Richmond* *Philosophy and Critical Thinking* *Communication Studies* *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York* *C 745* *718 482-5690*
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
