Helmut - I've long advocated a triadic temporality, based on the work of
Koichiro Matsuno, and have referred to such in various conference papers and
publications. I'm providing my analytic model, which is set up within a
Cartesian quadrant, for the Six Peircean Relations, within their spatial and
temporal values and categorical modes, in the attachment - as I don't know how
to include it in this post.
You will notice four spatial modes and three temporal modes.
The Relation of 3-3 is not included in the quadrant as it is both aspatial and
atemporal.
Edwina.
Epistemological Cut
----- Original Message -----
From: Helmut Raulien
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jon Alan Schmidt ; Gary Richmond ; Peirce-L
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:44 AM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semeiotic Visualization
Edwina, Jon, Gary, List, so, maybe it would be good to introduce a time-axis
into the visualization? Best,
Helmut
"Edwina Taborsky" <[email protected]>
The thing is, as I said earlier, the Sign (that triad) is not a closed
entity-in-itself. It operates in a complex network. So, for example, the
Dynamic Interpretant, in a mode of Firstness or Secondness or even
Thirdness...could connect with, and its informational content in whole or part,
could become part of a particular Dynamic Object. Or be generalized within the
laws of a Representamen. And then, that new Dynamic Object, and new
Representamen, could function again, in another semiosic interaction, and move
on this time to the Final Interpretant...which could, yet again, become part of
that original Dynamic Object...and be generalized within the Representamen.
And so on. It's a dynamic, complex, evolving process - and there's no Final
State.
Edwina
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Alan Schmidt
To: Gary Richmond ; [email protected]
Cc: Peirce-L
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semeiotic Visualization
Gary, Edwina, List:
Thanks for the kind words. I am still pondering whether this way of
visualizing everything might offer any helpful insights about the nature of the
various trichotomies and their logical order of determination, especially when
it comes to the interpretants.
Jon
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or
"Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
[email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to
[email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the
message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
