Gary R., thanks for the promotion!

My post "Deductive vs. ampliative; also, repletive vs. attenuative" hasn't reached a final or at any rate stable form, and it's gotten longer than I had expected. I've barely touched upon a related issue of what one deduces _/about/_ inductive premisses _/from/_ the inductive conclusion (this gets into things like confidence levels, so I'm going very slowly and carefully; I'm hoping to boil it down to a general remark about an advantage of clarity or non-ambiguity through framing an induction as repletive, rather than as attenuative, in the first place).

Regarding Michael Shapiro's blog _Language Lore_, which I read regularly, gmail seems to have broken one of the links and made both of them hard to recognize as links. I've repaired them below and I'm copying and pasting them right here along with a little more of the text, and with the URLs disembedded and shown (the I.U. peirce-l archive does not retain clickable links in messages):

Language Lore: About Language Lore
http://languagelore.net/about-language-lore-2/
This blog aims at the explanation of social variation in language, otherwise the meaning and motivation of language change in its social aspect. It is directly concerned with the rational explication of linguistic variety as evidenced by spontaneous innovations in present-day American English. For the most part, I examine the ascription of social value to novel linguistic entities, as one of the areas in which the effects of spontaneous innovations are most notable. A special feature of the data is the plethora of examples drawn from media and colloquial language. [....]
LANGUAGELORE.NET
http://languagelore.net/

Best, Ben

On 9/14/2015 3:41 PM, Gary Richmond wrote:

List,

To my knowledge, no one has contributed as much to the introduction and development of Peircean ideas into linguistics than has Michael Shapiro. I was reminded of this when Torklld Thellefsen recently posted a link to the home page of Michael's Facebook blog to his own blog.

In Shapiro's blog, which I follow rather closely, Michael discusses most 'all things linguistic' and, so, not only Peircean and semiotic topics. Yet it is always interesting and informative to read his comments, and I not infrequently find myself responding to them, or asking a question of him. See:

Language Lore: About Language Lore <http://languagelore.net/about-language-lore-2/> This blog aims at the explanation of social variation in language, otherwise the meaning and motivation of language change in its social aspect. It is directly concerned with the rational explication of linguistic variety as evidenced by spontaneous innovations in present-day American English. For t…
LANGUAGELORE.NET <http://LANGUAGELORE.NET>

As many of you know, the co-manager of this list and Arisbe, and webmaster /par excellence/ of Arisbe, Ben Udell, also maintains a blog. Since, as co-managers, Ben and I stay in rather close contact, not having heard from him for a week or so I recently asked him what he'd been up to and he answered that he'd been working hard on updating his most recent post to his blog, /The Tetrast/. Perhaps as much as Peirce himself was, Ben is adverse to self-promotion, but as I think this most recent blog entry might be of interest to several forum members, here's a link to Ben's blog, at the top of which is a very interesting discussion of deductive vs. ampliative inference, frequently and even recently discussed here. Of course, since Ben is a tetrast he also discusses what he terms repletive vs. attenuative inference.;

http://tetrast.blogspot.com/

Best,

Gary

Gary Richmond

*Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Communication Studies<
LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
*C 745
718 482-5690* *

**
**
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to