Michael, List:
The november 2015 TED talkk by Geneieve von Petzinger ("Why are these 32 symbols found in ancient caves all over Europe") that I just found out this morning might be relevant and possibly early evidence for diagrammaticity and iconic motivation for sign functions, semiosis, and communication.
Best
Eduardo
On Nov 28, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Michael Shapiro wrote:

Edwina, Jerry

Edwina - Latin is not a good example of anything because it's not a living language (sensu stricto). Classical Latin is after all a case of arrested development because Medieval Latin and New Latin are largely factitious continuations of CL and were only maintained by an elite.

Jerry - I'm glad that you were able to apply what I said to a wider sphere of disciplines. Sticking with language, here's a case from our own time and place which demonstrates to a T––but from a complementary perspective––what I meant by diagrammatization as the telos of language evolution:

"Attenuation of Arbitrariness in the Semantics of Quantification

The overall drift in language development is toward greater diagrammaticity (iconicity) between sound and meaning, which thereby necessarily results in the attenuation of the arbitrariness characterizing the fundamental relation of all language structure. This can be illustrated in the history of English by the gradual gain in scope of the quantifier of mass nouns less at the expense of its counterpart fewer, which according to the traditional norm is reserved for count nouns. Many speakers of American English (but not only) regularly substitute less for fewer where the norm specifies the latter to the exclusion of the former. The iconic motivation of this usage is twofold. First, less is shorter than fewer, thereby fitting it more adequately than its counterpart to its meaning, namely ‘lesser quantity’. Second, individuation as a semantic category is marked (more restricted in conceptual scope) than non-individuation, so that a drift toward non- individuation is a movement toward the unmarked member of the opposition, instantiating the general iconic (semeiotic) principle according to which language change favors replacement of marked units, categories, and contexts by unmarked ones."

Michael


-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .





-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to