I am not the one sending these messages to the Peirce list as I also think they
clutter it. I have asked Gary to choose what he find relevant to the extend he
follows the Sadhu Sanga list.
Best
Søren
Fra: E Valentine Daniel [mailto:[email protected]]
Sendt: 31. januar 2016 21:39
Til: Gary Richmond
Cc: Peirce-L
Emne: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Update on Sadhu Sanga posting issue
I agree, strongly.
val daniel
E. Valentine Daniel
Professor of Anthropology
Columbia University
1200 Amsterdam Avenue
New York, NY 10027
(212) 854-7764
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
On Jan 31, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Gary Richmond
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
List,
This is from an off-list email today from Ben Udell, list co-manager, regarding
the Sadhu Sanga postings.
I found a bunch of Sadhu Sanga list messages at the IUPUI peirce-l archive,
none of which I ever received. Reading them, I started to remember that I had
previously found such messages in my online spam folder, in December 2015. They
hadn't mentioned peirce-l in the headers, so I assumed that somebody had
subscribed me to Sadhu Sanga and so I sent an unsubscribe message from my email
account at that time. This morning I found Soren's in my online spam folder.
The others, being older, must have already been deleted. It is not clear that
Soren actually forwarded his message to peirce-l. It looks as if somebody made
peirce-l into a receive-only subscriber to the Sadhu Sanga list. Looking at the
IUPUI peirce-l archive, I found one such message's headers mentioning a spam
diagnostic. I suspect that the IUPUI server rejects some of the messages as
spam, accepts others, and that mine and others' email accounts are rejecting
them as spam. Anyway, at my email's online interface, I've added
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> to the "Allow" list in
order to make sure that anything actually from peirce-l gets through.
I think that the thing to do here is to ask the IUPUI technical person to check
whether peirce-l accepts messages directly from the Sadhu Sanga list (as if it
were a peirce-l subscriber) and, if so, to remove it. We don't need peirce-l
cluttered with automatic cross-postings from another list, especially one that
seems not particularly Peirce-focused, and more oriented to Vedic philosophy
and Young-Earth Creationism.
We are hoping to resolve this matter soon.
Best,
Gary R (writing as list moderator)
[Gary Richmond]
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Communication Studies
LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
C 745
718 482-5690
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send
a message not to PEIRCE-L but to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the line "UNSubscribe
PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
