List,

I would like to heartily recommend Michael Shapiro's article, "Sound and
Meaning in Shakespeare's Sonnets" which I read in a single sitting today in
Washington Square Park.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/417566?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Michael and I and a small number of NYC Peirceans have formed a club (which
we call The New Metaphysical Club after Peirce's Harvard group) which meets
once a month for lunch and Peirce-related and other discussions. At our
most recent meeting Michael gifted the members with copies of this article
which Michael, for good reason I think, considers one of his best. After
reading it I wrote Michael (Cc'd to our club's members) the following.

Dear Michael,

As fortune would have it, the New YorkTimes wasn't at my doorstep this
morning. As is my wont, when the weather is pleasant I read the Times as I
eat my breakfast and drink coffee in Washington Square Park. So, looking
for something else to read I picked up your article "Sound and Meaning in
Shakespeare's Sonnets" (thanks again for giving us copies) and took it with
me. I stayed in the park until I'd finished it.

What an extraordinary piece of scholarship! Your analysis (including your
statistical analysis) of how sonorants and obstruents effect meaning in the
sonnets (and groups of sonnets). especially as regards freedom and
constraint, is utterly convincing. That you extended your analysis of
sonority vs. obstruency in Shakespeare's sonnets in contrast with those of
a number of his contemporaries "chosen at random," not only demonstrates
another move in your solidly scientific methodology, but deepens your
analysis in crucial ways. Finally, it brings home your conclusion, not only
that of "the uniqueness of Shakespeare's poetic technique as regards
sonority in the sonnets," but of the poet's "unwavering motivated
implementation of sonority" through "a sound pattern that is an icon of the
sense."

I salute your accomplishment.

Needless to say, I would encourage [our club members] to read your article,
perhaps most especially in consideration of your methodology.

Best,

Gary



[image: Gary Richmond]

*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
*Communication Studies*
*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
*C 745*
*718 482-5690 <718%20482-5690>*
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to