Jerry,
I mean that Firstness is not the quality of being first in a sequence or ordered collection of three (or any number of) members; Secondness is not the quality of being second in a sequence; and Thirdness is not the quality of being third in a sequence. [[ Firstness is that which is such as it is positively and regardless of anything else. Secondness is that which is as it is in a second something's being as it is, regardless of any third. Thirdness is that whose being consists in its bringing about a secondness. ] —Peirce, EP2:267] Gary f. From: Jerry Rhee [mailto:jerryr...@gmail.com] Sent: 11-Aug-16 13:59 Gary f, list: What do you mean by “Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness are not ordinal concepts in Peirce’s phenomenology”, please? Best Jerry R
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
