Mike, Jon, list: I agree with Mike. The tone and indeed question of Jon's is, 
in my view, inquisitory and out-of-line. This is a blog devoted to 
Peirce-L...and not Edwina-L.  Therefore my personal beliefs are totally 
irrelevant and frankly, none of Jon's business. 

Since I am also claiming that Jon surely cannot be making the cognitive error 
of asserting that If and Only If someone has the SAME  beliefs as another 
person, can that person make a valid interpretation and analyses of this other 
person's beliefs.....then, I have no idea why he is so insistent on finding out 
my personal beliefs.

After all, it can't be the case that you can only understand and analyze Peirce 
if you are an iconic clone of him!

So- I have no intention of introducing my beliefs to this blog. My focus is on 
interpreting and analyzing Peirce.

Edwina


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jon Alan Schmidt 
  To: Mike Bergman 
  Cc: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 10:46 PM
  Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Theory of Thinking


  Mike, List:


  Tone is often difficult to convey or perceive accurately in e-mail messages.  
How is asking a sincere question prompted by a genuine desire to clarify 
someone else's views "not appropriate here"?  I always welcome feedback from 
the moderators, and am confident that one of them will inform me if I am out of 
line.  Besides, the thread topic is connected directly with "A Neglected 
Argument for the Reality of God," so this particular question is quite relevant.


  Regards,


  Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
  Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
  www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt


  On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Mike Bergman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi Jon,

    I think this is inquisitory in tone, and not appropriate here. Also, both 
of you: I appreciate your differences, but this is getting tiresome.

    Thanks, Mike



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  -----------------------------
  PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with 
the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to