Hi Gary F., Terry, List, Here are three diagrams I am using to explore the relations of determination between signs, objects and interpretants in the 10-fold classification (circa 1903 in the "Nomenclature and Division of Triadic Relations, So far as They are Determined").
The small roman numerals in the first colored diagram are an attempt to follow the order of the relations of determination, and to work out some features of the key relations (e.g., of reference and representation) that are determined according to these ordered patterns (or, more mathematical terms, paths). The main idea I am trying to develop in the two colored diagrams is that there are really two different sorts of triadic relations that result from the relations of determination between objects, signs and interpretants. He makes this clear in the middle of the page 290 in the EP, vol. 2. As far as I can tell, little has been said about this this double feature in Peirce's account. I'm highlighting this double feature with the branching arrow giving rise to two sorts of triadic relations on the bottom half of the page. Peirce says: "Triadic relations are in three ways divisible by trichotomy, according as the First, Second, or Third Correlate, respectively, is a mere possibility, and actual existent, or a law. ... There will be besides a second similar division of triadic relations into ten classes, according as the dyadic relations which they constitute between either the First and Second Correlates, or the First and Third, or the Second and Third are of the nature of possibilities, facts, or laws; and these ten classes will be subdivided in different ways." If you would, let me know if these diagrams help at all to clarify what he might be saying here in NDTR--and/or where the diagrams might be leading me astray. --Jeff Jeffrey Downard Associate Professor Department of Philosophy Northern Arizona University (o) 928 523-8354 ________________________________________ From: g...@gnusystems.ca [g...@gnusystems.ca] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 11:23 AM To: Jeffrey Brian Downard Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] APERI project Hola Jeff, In the first of the two PDF diagrams you sent, I don't get what the roman numerals inside the triangle signify. I gather that "i" is object determining sign, and "ii" is sign determining interpretant, but the other roman numerals there are a mystery to me. The other diagram is less clear to me, but I'll keep working on it ... I also found the Nadin paper that you got the R-O-I triangle diagram from, will put it on my reading list (if you think it's worthwhile). He seems to use the old sign/representamen distinction that's been read into Peirce (inaccurately, as I showed awhile back) but that may not be a problem in his case. I also read all the pages on the Abductive Pathways site, bookmarked it and look forward to updates! Do you plan to use it as a blog? gary -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Brian Downard [mailto:jeffrey.down...@nau.edu] Sent: 13-Sep-16 12:06 To: g...@gnusystems.ca Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] APERI project Hi Gary, Here are two diagrams that I've been working on. The first diagram is an attempt to represent the relations of determination and the 10-fold classification of signs that is found in "Nomenclature and Division of Triadic Relations." The diagram is only meant to convey the relations on the strata of possibles--that is, between possible objects, signs and interpretants. Then, the more complicated diagram is for the more extensive relations of determination in the 66-fold classification. I'm using the same diagrams for the strata of existences and necessitants. The three levels can be nested together. These diagrams only capture the structural relations and resulting classes for one "step" in the process of semiosis. In order to get a fuller picture, the process would need to continue--as when the interpretant serves as a sign to some further interpretant, and so on. These are still just works in progress. In order to fill in the picture, I need to spell out how the various sorts of relations function as relations of reference, representation, etc. For starters, I'd like to use the simpler diagram to help sort out the relations of reference to ground, reference to object and reference to interpretant, and then the single, double and triple reference that Peirce characterizes in the early Lowell Lectures. --Jeff
Peirce 10-fold classification of signs.pdf
Description: Peirce 10-fold classification of signs.pdf
Peirce 10-fold classification of signs with strata.pdf
Description: Peirce 10-fold classification of signs with strata.pdf
10-fold classification determination strata.pdf
Description: 10-fold classification determination strata.pdf
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .