Jerry,
If Peirce had intended any further meaning, he would have
mentioned it explicitly.
Really?
Yes, really. Peirce wrote about logic and EGs in multiple articles,
lectures, and MSS. He didn't say everything in every article. But
if you can't find something in at least one source, it's highly
unlikely that Peirce had intended it.
There is no notion of 'trust' in the EGs themselves.
Really?
Yes, really.
I suppose that such conjectures are of interest to some.
They're not conjectures. They're observations based on studying
Peirce's writings. If you claim otherwise, show the evidence.
John
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
