Jerry R., List: My question was prompted by the fact that Edwina's definition of the Representamen requires it always to be *internal *to an agent; i.e., in her view, there is no such thing as an *external *Representamen.
Regards, Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Jerry Rhee <jerryr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jon, list, > > You said: > In your *semiotic *terminology, *what* bridges the external gap between > the internal Representamen of the utterer and the internal Representamen of > the receiver? > > mind if I try? > > the external representamen of the commens? > > Best, > J >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
