On 1/27/2019 12:36 AM, Gary Richmond wrote:
I might quibble with the language "/pure/ index"--is there such a thing?

I support the quibble.  Just look at any index, such as a weather vane.

It has an arrow that points in the direction of the wind.
And that arrow resembles (is an icon of) the kind of arrow
an archer would use.

It also has an icon of a rooster on top, which gives another
indication about the direction:  birds, unlike mammals, typically
face into the wind, especially when it's strong.  They do so
because (an argument) they don't want it to ruffle their feathers.

And since a weather vane is such a typical index, an icon of
the kind that has an arrow with a rooster on top is often used
as a symbol of an index.

And then look at Peirce's ten categories of signs, which are
derived by considering all possible combinations of his triple
trichotomy.

And by the way, logic is "another name for semeiotic".

...the subject matter here is not limited to logic as the science
of Symbols--it is semeiotic as the science of all Signs

On this point, see below for the quotations from my note in
the thread "The structure of recent philosophy".

John
____________________________________________________________________

CP 2.227:  "Logic, in its general sense, is, as I believe I have
shown, only another name for semiotic (σημειωτική), the quasi-
necessary, or formal, doctrine of signs."

1904, MS [R] 693:188-190: "The study of languages ought to be
based upon a study of the necessary conditions to which signs
must conform in order to fulfill their functions as signs. I have
gradually been led to conclude that it is best to identify logic
with this study."

1909, MS [R] 634:15:  "…it would seem proper that in the present
state of knowledge logic should be regarded as coëxtensive with
General Semeiotic, the a priori theory of signs."
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to