List, Edwinia:
> On Jan 30, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> JC: In response to your question, one uses the word in a context appropriate. 
> Thats how new words entry into the evolution of language.
> 
> EDWINA:

> To declare that 'one uses the word in a context appropriate' doesn't deal 
> with the problem of: "if very few understand your words' - then, the 
> communication is empty of meaning'. The key concerns are: 'very few'. 
> Certainly, one can use an obscure term, whose usage is confined to a select 
> few of initiates into that context' - but- this isolation of Peircean theory 
> to a select few is exactly what we have been discussing.
>> 

If an author wants to communicate an idea to the reader, then it is the 
author’s responsibility to use the words in such a way that the meaning is 
clear.  

If an author wants to use a specific word to communicate a specific meaning 
unfamiliar to the expected readership, then it is the author’s responsibility 
to use the language in such a way that the reader can interpret the specific 
word such that the distinction is clear to the reader.

Lazy authors do not bother themselves with such time-consuming tasks.  They 
just wander along, on and on and on.  I admit I am often a lazy author, 
especially to list serves.

As for CSP, he assignment to the philosophical dustbin is largely due to his 
writing styles.
His emergent genesis is buried in his styles. His failure to place his numerous 
new words and concepts in an appropriate context bores most philosopher to 
death as readers of his “gibberish”.
T’is a pity.  But it is what it is.

Sorry if this message reads like it is addressed to high schoolers.
Is it possible that the highly sophisticated readers of this list serve do not 
wish to deal with simpler logic?

Cheers

Jerry



-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to