Helmut, List,

The bracket notation of the form (x1, x2, ..., xk) a text rendition of
a "minimal negation operator" on k logical variables x1, x2, ..., xk.
This is an operator which gives the result 1 (= true) if and only if
exactly one of the k variables is 0 (= false).

So the 0-ary operator, or the empty form ( ), is equivalent to the
constant 0 (= false) since there can't be just one variable false
if there aren't any variables at all in the argument list.

The 1-ary operator (x) means the same thing as "not x".
The 2-ary operator (x, y) means the same thing as "x XOR y".
And so on ...

At any rate, this is how things are in the "existential interpretation".

Here's a link to a brief article on minimal negation operators:

https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operator

Regards,

Jon

On 2/24/2020 3:35 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
Jon, List,
does the comma mean having something in common, so "y XOR x" = "(y,x)" , meaning
that something that is x cannot be y, so that it its not so, that "x" and "y"
have anything in common?
I was thinking about possibility and probability. Is it so, that possibility
means "x OR NOT x", written ""x(x)" in entitative Graph, which would be written
in EG and DPC like ((x)x): "NOT(NOT x AND x)". It implies that from x follows x
(tautology).
Probability is possibility with values (is that so?), and maybe with a time
range for this possibility, so I was thinking how can you write probability in a
calculus. Maybe like e.g. "dx" has the probability of one third to happen in one
hour, one may write it like "d/h((1/3x) 2/3x) = d/3h((x)2x). Maybe this is
completely wrong, I am not good with mathematics, but maybe something like that?
Best,
Helmut
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to