Cf: Differential Logic • Discussion 1
At:
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/04/09/differential-logic-%e2%80%a2-discussion-1/
Re: Joseph Simpson
At: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/structural-modeling/xB5tRt4mcEM/IfaF8YlLBgAJ
Thanks, Joe, glad you liked the table, I've got a million of 'em! I'll be setting another mess of tables directly as we
continue studying the effects of differential operators on families of propositional forms.
For anyone wondering, "Where's the Peirce?" — he is the Atlas on whose shoulders the whole world of differential logic
turns. The elegant efficiency of Peirce's logical graphs, augmented by Spencer Brown and extended to cactus graphs,
made it feasible for the first time to take on the extra complexities of differential propositional calculus. So that
theme is a constant throughout the development of differential logic.
Hope you and yours are safe and sound,
Jon
On 4/8/2020 4:38 PM, joseph simpson wrote:
> Jon:
>
> I like the chart, things are starting to make a little more sense to me.
>
> Further, I read your paper, "An Architecture for Inquiry :
> Building Computer Platforms for Discovery" from Research Gate.
[
https://www.academia.edu/1270327/An_Architecture_for_Inquiry_Building_Computer_Platforms_for_Discovery
]
>
> The examples in the paper help to add additional context.
>
> Take care, be good to yourself and have fun,
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 7:12 AM Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Cf: Differential Logic • 8
>> At: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/04/08/differential-logic-%e2%80%a2-8/
>>
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
