List, This study shows how nicotine, charged with a very negative image to the point of being considered a lethal poison (dicent symbol) can be competed in the collective consciousness (the commens) by the rise in the lattice of classes of signs of an image by rational and non-rational (magic thinking) ways . The latter, which never encounters the contexts of verification, is always guaranteed to create an ambivalent image that poses a public health problem. Hydroxychloroquine has shown how easily non-rational paths are used in some countries to serve political causes. To help you a lesson with 4 exercises : Build the lattice of the 10 classes of signs in one lesson https://www.academia.edu/42974040/Build_the_lattice_of_the_10_classes_of_signs_in_one_lesson hoping it will be useful to you
Best regards, Robert Le dim. 3 mai 2020 à 18:09, robert marty <[email protected]> a écrit : > List, John,Gary, Jon, Jon Allan > > Preamble of > > https://www.academia.edu/42930701/Nicotine_a_semiotic_confrontation_between_life_and_death > > > "This study is the third moment in a scientific approach of "knowledge by > models" that perfectly suits Peirce's designs in this field. Indeed, Peirce > classifies science in the following way (see C.S. Peirce, 1976: NEM, vol. > IV, 1122]: > > *- mathematics, the study of ideal constructions without reference to > their real existence**,* > > Here are my constructions: I consider two abstract categories > > X àYàZ on the one hand > > A1 àA2 àA3 …… àAn on the other hand (with all axioms checked for the > composition of the arrows) > > It is found that there are exactly (n + 2)*(n +1)/2 covariant functors > from the first to the second categories and that, moreover, this set of > functors is naturally organized in a lattice structure by the natural > transformations of functors that we know how to define on this set. > > *This part can be controlled by a mathematician no semiotician**.* > > A computer tool can do that very well : see > patrick-benazet.chez-alice.fr/treillis_en_ligne/lattices > > This lattices are compounds mathematical objects, not very complex if n > not too large ... Indeed for n = 3 there are 10 functors, 28 for n = 10, 66 > for n = 10 ... > > -*empirics, the study of phenomena with the purpose of identifying their > forms with those mathematics has studied,* > > Peirce is proposing after years of studying the functioning of: > > - *phenomena* (phanerons) in human minds that he reduces to 3 > major categories (corroborated by a reduction theorem: Herzberger, Burch, > Marty), between which he recognizes relationships of involution > > > > - and also *signs* in social life, starting with three-item signs > that he calls Object, Sign and Interpretant, and that he classifies them > into ten classes, and then when the sign expands to six elements with 28 > classes, ... > > > > - and even that it highlight*s affinities* between the triadic > signs that direct attention to relationships between classes of signs by > triplets between these elements > > This justifies that the forms I have built are suitable to fulfil this > condition. > > *This part can be controlled by a semiotician no mathematician**.* > > The third Peirce's classes is: > > - *Pragmatics, the study of how we ought to behave in the ligth of the > truths of empirics."* > > This is what is proposed in the following analysis. It follows Peirce's > recommendations but is fallible and asks to be criticized." > > Be waiting and best regards, > > Robert Marty >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
