> On May 15, 2020, at 3:02 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> My life history made me interested in the interface between psychology, 
> epistemology and intuitive logic.  My impression was logic includes 3ns: 
> anyone comment on that please?

3ns is a symbol string used by some CSP students to represent a vast array of 
terms without any clear demarcations among the meanings.  The usage of this 
symbol string is only very rarely encountered in the general logical literature.

As an aside, I would suggest that the posts to this list serve are NOT 
recommended for beginning or even practicing logicians. A vast array of formal 
and informal logics exist in mathematics, philosophy, the natural sciences, 
religion, theology, literature, etc, each with its own particularities and 
peculiarities.  Logic is a helluva lot more coherent than the mish-mash of 
personal philosophies posted here in various efforts to justify individual 
beliefs and world views. 

As a further aside and gratuitous comment, I will add a personal comment that 
some of my colleagues may consider uncharitable. At best, CSP texts merely 
serve as a launching pad for various (controversial?) opinions.  At least that 
is how I see it after about two decades of following the scatologies.
One significant reason for the endless difficulties of interpreting CSP texts 
is that the propositional logic of chemistry is extraordinarily entangled among 
several disciplines such that syntagma, syntropies and syzygies are inherent in 
his texts as essential components of his propositions / graph theories and 
philosophies.

Gila Sher has many well-informed opinions on this subject, independent of any 
obvious chemical connotations.

Cheers

Jerry


-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to