Jon A,
I agree that (NEM 4:20) is one of Peirce's best
definitions of 'sign'.  I also believe that it is his clearest definition
of 'formal semiotic'.  But in talking about Peirce's logic. it's essential
to distinguish three distinct kinds of logic that he developed in detail: 
mathematical logic, formal semiotic, and normative logic. Elsewhere. he
wrote that mathematical logic is the smallest part.  But without
mathematical logic as the foundation, formal semiotic would not be
possible.  And without formal semiotic, normative logic would not be
possible. 
A huge amount of confusion on Peirce-L could be avoided
by distinguishing which of the three senses of 'logic' is intended in any
occurrence of the word in Peirce's writing.
JA> One of Peirce's
clearest and most complete definitions of a sign is one he gives in the
context of providing a definition for logic, and so it is informative to
view it in that setting.

CSP> Logic will here be defined as
formal semiotic.  A definition of a sign will be given which no more
refers to human thought than does the definition of a line as the place
which a particle occupies, part by part, during a lapse of time.  Namely,
a sign is something, A, which brings something, B, its interpretant sign
determined or created by it, into the same sort of correspondence with
something, C, its object, as that in which itself stands to C. It is from
this definition, together with a definition of “formal”, that I deduce
mathematically the principles of logic.  I also make a historical review
of all the definitions and conceptions of logic, and show, not merely that
my definition is no novelty, but that my non-psychological conception of
logic has virtually been quite generally held, though not generally
recognized.  (NEM 4, 20–21).
Note the word 'here' in the first
sentence: "Logic will here be defined as formal semiotic."  That
does not rule out other senses of the word 'logic' in  other writings. 

John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by The PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to