Dear list members (especially those of you interested in linguistics), 

I have been working on verb operators in English in the light of Peirce's three 
categories and it seems firstness, secondness, and thirdness appear at 
different levels of the analysis so that the broader approach (that includes 
all types of sentences) shows the following: 

1rstness: V-zero (can't find the ASCII code for zero) 
TO V 
V-ing 

2ndness: V-s 
V-ed 

3rdness: MODAL + V-zero 
HAVE + V-en 
BE + V-ing 
BE + V-en 
DO + V-zero 


A more restricted approach (that doesn't take into account V1-V2 structures) 
leaves out the operators of firstness above and seems to redistribute the other 
operators as follows: 

1rstness : V-s 
V-ed 

3rdness: MODAL + V-zero 
HAVE + V-en 
BE + V-ing 
BE + V-en 

2ndness: DO + V-zero 


And then a third, more detailed approach of the 4 operators of thirdness above 
would lead to the following conclusion: 

3rdness: MODAL + V-zero 
1rstness: HAVE + V-en 
2ndness: BE + V-ing 
BE + V-en 

I was rather happy with that still-in-progress background when teaching my 
first year students of E.S.L. until I made a video (to which you'll find a link 
below) in which I heard myself say that operator of secondness DO + V-zero is 
not compatible with the operators of thirdness (MODAL + V-zero, HAVE + V-en, BE 
+ V-ing, and BE + V-en). Secondness incompatible with thirdness? That doesn't 
make any sense, does it? I have just realized that and I now find it hard to 
see how to make the link between the verb operators in English and Peirce's 
categories and I thought I would look for help on Peirce-L. 

Would you happen to have some ideas on the matter? 

Any insight would be greatly appreciated! 

I guess I'll have to rethink my system (hopefully in the light of your 
comments) but for now I have put online a video presentation of the English 
verb equation I have been working on over the past two decades, and I thought 
it might possibly be of interest to you and/or your students if your field 
involves both semiotics and linguistic grammar. This equation has been designed 
for first year students to use throughout their undergraduate studies and can 
be adapted for high school education or beginners of E.S.L., the aim being to 
get one's ideas clear on how to give a form to a verb. This easy-to-grasp 
six-step process includes a very short series of operators resorting to 
firstness, secondness, and thirdness, that gives rise to all possible verb 
forms and to a plethora of verb phrases. You can find it on the web by simply 
typing the key words "verb equation" on YouTube or by clicking the link below: 

[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgUxlfbleBM | 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgUxlfbleBM ] 

I would really appreciate it if you and/or your students would be so kind as to 
give me some feedback on that work. Please also feel free to share with anyone 
who might be interested. 

Thank you for your answers & collaboration. 

Best regards & wishes. 

Cécile Cosculluela 
UPPA (University of Pau) 

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by The PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to