Robert, 
I thought that the following paragraph in your article
was especially informative:
>From the "Five paths"
article":  We now have a semiotic tool of greater scope than the
lattice itself, since it does not only classify signs, but also
"streams of signs", that is, interpretative habits that have
been inscribed in these paths and, as a result, have become communal
semiotic characteristics.  The lattices of the five paths (Table 5)
therefore also classify the social histories of the modes of
interpretation of signs
The words 'communal' and 'social' remind me
of Peirce's discussion of the "collateral experience" that the
reader, viewer or listener uses to interpret signs.  Following is the
definition from the Commens Dictionary:
1908 [c.] | Letters to Lady
Welby | MS [R] L463:14:  "A Sign may bring before the Mind, a new
hypothesis, or a sentiment, a quality, a respect, a degree, a thing, an
event, a law, etc.  But it never can convey anything to a person who has
not had a direct experience or at least original self-experience of the
same object, collateral experience."
Depending on their
collateral experience, the person who interprets a sign may ffine a
degenerate interpretation or an accretive interpretation.  The five paths
show the possible kinds of differences -- degenerate or accretive. 
Although there are just five kinds of paths, each kind may have very
different accretions or deletions, depending on the collateral experience
of the person who interprets the sign.
In my case, I had collateral
experience that suggested some rather distracting thoughts while I was
reading your article.  The words 'nicotine', 'stream', and 'French'
reminded me of a class in fluid mechanics that I attended many years
ago.
The professor recommended Gaulois Cigarettes -- not for
smoking, but for wind-tunnel experiments.  The Gaulois smoke is so thick
that it doesn't dissipate in a wind tunnel.  It shows very clear streams
in the flow.
Locke and others talked about "association of
ideas".  Peirce said that those ideas roughly correspond to his
"experiences in the phaneron".   There is an enormous range of
possible variations among different interpreters,
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to