For the words I have this quotation that I had placed on the front page of
my book (L'algèbre des signes, 1990) and which says almost the same thing
but in the field of language using the "quasi-morphism":
 notes --> words ;  melody --> speech, music score --->algebra
"All speech is but such an algebra, the repeated signs being the words,
which have relations by virtue of the meanings associated with the them "
(CP 3.418)
The best,
Robert
Honorary Professor ; PhD Mathematics ; PhD Philosophy
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty
*https://martyrobert.academia.edu/ <https://martyrobert.academia.edu/>*



Le dim. 31 janv. 2021 à 11:58, Frederik Stjernfelt <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> It is interesting Peirce is using the example of melody for his third,
> synthetic kind of consciousness – and also as a metaphor for other
> syntheses like thought, in Robert’s quote.
>
>
>
> Here, there is an interesting parallel to the earliest gestalt theorists
> in Europe around the same time – Stumpf, Ehrenfels – also taking the melody
> as the prime example of gestalts. Only later, gestaltists turned to visual
> examples.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Frederik
>
>
>
> PS Dear John – I tried to email you at [email protected], but it bounces
> back – is there another address where I can reach you?
>
>
>
> *Fra: *John Sowa <[email protected]>
> *Svar til: *John Sowa <[email protected]>
> *Dato: *søndag den 31. januar 2021 kl. 04.46
> *Til: *Robert Marty <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *Auke van Breemen <[email protected]>, Cornelis de Waal <
> [email protected]>, Gary Richmond <[email protected]>, Jon Alan
> Schmidt <[email protected]>, Peirce List <[email protected]>,
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "
> [email protected]" <[email protected]>, "
> [email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Emne: *Re: [PEIRCE-L] Existential Graphs in 1911
>
>
>
> Robert,
>
> Thanks for finding that quotation:
>
> > Thought is a thread of melody running through the succession of our
> sensations” (CP 5.395)
>
> Now that you mention it, I recall reading that some time ago.  It must
> have been lurking somewhere in my mind, but well beneath the conscious
> level.
>
> In any case, it's very appropriate.  The connection to sensations
> emphasizes the relation to Bill's term "embodied experience".
>
> It is also related to my point that the total context is more important
> than particular words. That doesn't mean that words are irrelevant, but
> they can be highly misleading when taken out of context.
>
> John
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to