Robert, I can see how your Categorical Theoretic Structuralism is a way of
establishing the credentials of phaneroscopy as a science. But it doesn’t
explain why Peirce’s classification places it first among all positive
sciences, prior to logic and semiotic. Almost any positive science can call
on a mathematical theory and apply it to theorize about its observations;
but phaneroscopy is unique in this respect because it is supposed to
“dispense with preconceptions” and consider phenomena in their Firstness.
I’m hoping that the second part of André’s presentation on prescission will
help to show how phaneroscopy can be “pre-truth.” But I think we should wait
and see if there are any other comments or questions on slide 7 before we go
on to the next one.

 

Gary f.

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On
Behalf Of robert marty
Sent: 26-Jun-21 17:34

 

List,

My aim is not to differ from André's approach to discovering categories. I
do not want to engage in an endless philosophical debate about the reality
of mathematical objects and their complex relationship with experience. The
disagreements will come later because I assume a Categorical Theoretic
Structuralism position in mathematics. I extend it to phaneroscopy using an
isomorphism between an abstract mathematical object (Poset or Functor) and
the set of relations between Peirce's universal categories as he defines
them. It seems to me that this consolidates the scientific status of
phaneroscopy. Then - note that this is my conclusion - I point out all the
interest in considering these structures because they agree with Peirce's
objective idealism if we need a philosophical reference. 

Your quotation from Peirce introducing the question of truth is
enlightening in this respect: "And this truth like every truth must come to
us by the way of experience. No apriorist ever denied that.". Indeed,
whether you consider me as an apriorist or not, it will not destroy this
isomorphism. All means are good to reach the truth; let us not waste time in
vain quarrels. 

Sincerely,

Robert Marty

 

Honorary Professor; Ph.D. Mathematics; Ph.D. Philosophy 

 <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty>
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty

 <https://martyrobert.academia.edu/> https://martyrobert.academia.edu/

 

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the 
body.  More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to