Janet,

Excellent, thank you for this. It seems more likely to me now that a 
digitization process somewhere along the way introduced the new errors.

With gratitude,
Franklin

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 11, 2022, at 1:01 AM, Janet Singer <jsin...@measures.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Franklin,
> The two errors you noted are not in the Dover copy — see attached.
> 
>> On Jan 10, 2022, at 5:52 PM, pragmaticist.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> As a follow up, I would love to get a good hardcopy, but I am now wary of 
>> newer printed editions. If you have a chance, might you check a couple of 
>> pages in your Dover hardcopy? I am attaching screenshots of the pages from 
>> my hardcopy. The first is in Ch VI, just past halfway through the chapter, 
>> and the second is in Ch VII, near the beginning of the chapter.
>> 
>> These are not the only errors I found, but I think confirming these two 
>> errors will serve as sufficient evidence regarding the fidelity of the Dover 
>> edition to the original. So if these errors are not in your Dover copy, then 
>> I can try for a copy of that. If they’re already present in that Dover copy, 
>> I should probably give up hope on any editions published after 1958.
>> 
>> I would be no grateful for your help.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Franklin Ransom
>> 
>> <image0.jpeg><image1.jpeg>
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jan 10, 2022, at 7:53 PM, pragmaticist.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> 
>>> This note is also in my hardcopy. The errors to which I refer are not 
>>> these, but new ones apparently produced due to the digitization process.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 10, 2022, at 4:21 PM, Janet Singer <jsin...@measures.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The 1958 Dover hardcopy makes these references to errors in the original:
>>>> 
>>>> “This Dover edition, first published in 1958, is the first American 
>>>> printing of the work originally published by Macmillan in 1854, with all 
>>>> corrections made within the text.” 
>>>> 
>> <Note.jpeg>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 10, 2022, at 7:46 AM, pragmaticist.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> List,
>>>>> 
>>>>> After receiving an off-list suggestion to pick up an introduction to 
>>>>> symbolic logic and use Wikipedia as a resource, it will be well for me to 
>>>>> clarify that I am quite familiar with symbolic logic, having mastered 
>>>>> sentential logic and predicate calculus, dabbled in modal logic, and 
>>>>> gotten to be familiar with Peirce’s graphical logic. The purpose of 
>>>>> understanding Boole’s work is not to learn symbolic logic—which is in 
>>>>> fact quite different in many respects from Boolean calculus—but 
>>>>> specifically to understand better the genesis of Peirce’s work in logic, 
>>>>> which I take to be a broader and deeper conception of logic than one 
>>>>> finds in studies of symbolic logic.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Franklin Ransom
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 10, 2022, at 12:03 AM, pragmaticist.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello list,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It has been some years since I lasted posted, and I have only been 
>>>>>> lurking ever since.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am hoping to get some advice on reading George Boole’s An 
>>>>>> Investigation of the Laws of Thought. This is a text which CS Peirce 
>>>>>> references in his earlier logical work, and I was hoping to follow along 
>>>>>> Peirce’s early work by understanding what he used as a basis for 
>>>>>> developing his own ideas.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’ve had some difficulty though in trying to decipher Boole’s work. His 
>>>>>> earlier essay on his work I was able to get through, but the book proves 
>>>>>> more challenging. At first I tried an online PDF, but what I found had 
>>>>>> noticeable typos, the sort of thing one really wants to avoid in a work 
>>>>>> using a lot of abstract symbols.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So some years ago I acquired a hard copy of the currently printed 
>>>>>> version from Watchmaker Publishing, but found the book still having 
>>>>>> typos. This is rather frustrating, as they’ve had over a century and a 
>>>>>> half to get it right. I suspect it has to do with digitization of the 
>>>>>> book and then publishing the latest hard copy based on this poor 
>>>>>> digitization. After trying for a couple years to get through it, I 
>>>>>> decided I couldn’t figure out if it was due to typos that I don’t know 
>>>>>> are typos, or simply inability to comprehend on my part, that has kept 
>>>>>> me from being able to interpret the work successfully.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So what I’d like to know is if there are possibly any publications on 
>>>>>> Boole’s work, hopefully in relation to Peirce’s early logical work 
>>>>>> extending the Boolean calculus, that might assist me in finally getting 
>>>>>> through Boole’s book. Any advice or suggestions in regard to this matter 
>>>>>> will be appreciated.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>> Franklin Ransom
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>>>> ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
>>>>> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to 
>>>>> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . 
>>>>> ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to 
>>>>> l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the 
>>>>> message and nothing in the body.  More at 
>>>>> https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
>>>>> ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  
>>>>> and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
>>>> 
> 
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu 
> . 
> ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu 
> with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in 
> the body.  More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
> ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
> co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu 
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the 
body.  More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to