Alex,

Thanks for that example.  It shows the importance of the unconscious 
computation that is performed in the human cerebellum, whose perceptions and 
actions are totally unconscious.   I urge everyone to click on the link in your 
note.

There is an important reason why the human drone experts lost in the 
competition with the fully automated drone:  the humans used a combination of 
high-speed cerebellar computation (as the unmanned drone does) with the much 
slower (and conscious) decision making in the cerebral cortex.   Those 
conscious decisions slowed their performance.

Compare that with the high-speed performance by the gymnastic champion Simone 
Biles.  She devoted years of conscious effort to train her cerebellum to 
perform the various motions automatically.  Before each competition, she 
perfects the training for each routine she performs.  In a performance that has 
multiple routines, she uses her cerebral cortex to check the positions and 
timing for each routine.  Then she launches a pretrained routine that is 
totally under the control of the unconscious cerebellum.

All of us use the cerebellum for routine processing in walking, eating, driving 
a car, or typing on a keyboard.   Mathematicians take advantage of that 
high-speed processing in the most complex kinds of math.   But writing a proof 
uses the slower conscious processing in the cerebral cortex to check whether 
the high-speed calculations are correct.

Note that the processes in the cerebellum are precise for what they do.  The 
errors can occur when the decisions for running them (made by the cerebral 
cortex) are not correct.

Note that none of these processes, either by the cerebrum or by the cerebellum, 
could be performed by the LLMs.  The Large Language Models might respond to a 
verbal command to execute a routine by the cerebellum.  But all their 
operations are probabilistic, and they're based on vague and often ambiguous 
natural language.   They can't  do the precise checking and testing that 
guarantee accuracy.

LLMs are useful.   But they're just one more tool in the huge toolkit of AI 
technology.  They do a limited range of operations very well, but they can't do 
the whole job.

John

----------------------------------------
From: "alex.shkotin" <[email protected]>
Subject: [ontolog-forum] FYI:Champion-level Drone Racing using Deep 
Reinforcement Learning (Nature, 2023)

https://youtu.be/fBiataDpGIo?si=bDaE1XR4dQGJXqo6
Colleagues, while we are formalizing theoretical knowledge and building 
structures that model reality, it is interesting to look at achievements in the 
field where algorithms decide everything, but they are also helped by AI.

Alex
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the 
body.  More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to