Steven, could you explain what you mean by "sense" in your post below (the "sense" for which you trust there is a mechanical explanation)? In your blurb, you seem to use the word in at least 3 different meanings.
Talking about Aetherometry, I think you might find the Correas' book "Nanometric Functions of Bioenergy", large parts of which address questions of the specificity and logic of the living, to be of considerable interest and relevance to your work. -malgosia At 1:15 AM -0800 3/5/12, Steven Ericsson-Zenith wrote: >I will take the strong emotion to be both positive and competitive. It's a >first draft cover piece and you are right to correct me concerning Frege's >Sense and Reference, thank you. > >"The mechanics of sense" simply refers to the mechanism characterizing sense >in biophysics, I assume that there is such a mechanism. Hence, I do not view >sense as incorporeal, nor do I view the scientific mechanism as facing demise. > >You are, I know, an authority on the lack of substance (Aetherometry). :-) > >I appreciate your input Malgosia and will certainly consider it. > >With respect, >Steven > > >-- > Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith > Institute for Advanced Science & Engineering > http://iase.info > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L listserv. To remove yourself from this list, send a message to [email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of the message. To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]
