Kirsti, There wasn't an attachment--what you must have seen is how one of my browsers (Safari or Firefox, whichever I used) represents a reply to a previous e-mail. Sorry.
NB -----Original Message----- From: Kirsti Määttänen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 5/8/2006 1:51 PM To: Peirce Discussion Forum Cc: Subject: [peirce-l] RE: Entelechy Neal, I didn't succeed in opening your attachment. Could you possibly copy it and send it as a mail? Kirsti 7.5.2006 kello 23:09, Neal Bruss kirjoitti: . . . and notice how the first two clauses of the passage link "entelechy" with the Peirce's freuqent turn to grammar in his logic, and, of course, to his semiotic. ["The mode of being of the composition of thought, which is always of the nature of the attribution of a predicate to a subject . . . ]. > > > > <winmail.dat>--- > Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber email@example.com