Someone mentioned to me that Daniel McNeill and Paul Freiberger in _Fuzzy Logic_ say Zedeh's fuzzy logic arose from Peirce and Jan Lukasiewicz. Now certainly Peirce often ridiculed clear boundaries (such as between say the living and non-living). And one could argue that his doctrine of continuity entails something like fuzzy logic. But did Peirce ever relate his notion of vague signs to fuzzy properties? All I could see were properties that weren't up to the listener to determine. That says nothing about whether the properties are properly determined external to the listener, whether they are ontologically indeterminate, or whether they are "fuzzy."

Is there anything Peirce writes on this?



---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to