Someone mentioned to me that Daniel McNeill and Paul Freiberger in
_Fuzzy Logic_ say Zedeh's fuzzy logic arose from Peirce and Jan
Lukasiewicz. Now certainly Peirce often ridiculed clear boundaries
(such as between say the living and non-living). And one could argue
that his doctrine of continuity entails something like fuzzy logic.
But did Peirce ever relate his notion of vague signs to fuzzy
properties? All I could see were properties that weren't up to the
listener to determine. That says nothing about whether the
properties are properly determined external to the listener, whether
they are ontologically indeterminate, or whether they are "fuzzy."
Is there anything Peirce writes on this?
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com