At 19/05/01 15:27 -0700, you wrote:
>Brad, come on. I asked Michael K. to cool it, because I thought you had.
>Nobody benefits from repeatedly going over the same tit for tat stuff.
>You made your case fairly clearly in your last post, calling for a
>kinder-gentler IMF.
>
>Let me ask a question about that post: Is the role of the IMF to help
>eliminate financial crises -- which was supposedly its original intention
>-- or is it to jam neo-liberal policies down the throats of weaker states?
Isn't part of the problem that we are confined to present definitions of
the problem?
Let me persist in trying to reframe a different question.
Why cannot the IMF's role be to manage world money?
Chris Burford
London
