>please quote what Brenner says and explain why it's a "pile of crap."
>
>Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

"These thinkers [Baran, Sweezy et al] move too quickly from the proposition
that capitalism is bound up with, and supportive of, continuing
underdevelopment in large parts of the world, to the conclusion not only
that the rise of underdevelopment is inherent in the extension of the world
division of labour through capitalist expansion, but also that the
'development of underdevelopment' is an indispensable condition for
capitalist development itself."

100 percent crapola. Pure, undiluted nonsense. Neo-Kautskyism. A rotten bag
of potatoes that has fallen between two stools and can not get up, as my
old friend Adolfo Olaechea used to say.

Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to