Michael Perelman wrote: > As I understand Microsoft's plans, it does not intend to have > corporate users upgrade. Following Jeremy Rifkin, they plan to have > corporations >LEASE their programs for a limited period. It would > then be illegal NOT to >upgrade. Lovely. It's not quite as easy to make people pay you for what you make in the hardware sector, though. I see (<http://finance.yahoo.com/mo>) the semiconductor manufacturers are reporting a book-to-bill ration of 0.42. That means that for every hundred orders they're filling, only 42 orders are coming in. No wonder this latest 'recovery' couldn't quite see the week out. Ever the bear, Rob.
- RE: technology as a reason for hope? Brown, Martin (NCI)
- Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope? Jim Devine
- RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope? Eric Nilsson
- Killing Clippy Michael Pollak
- Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope? ravi narayan
- RE: RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope? Brown, Martin (NCI)
- Re: technology as a reason for hope? Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for ho... Rob Schaap
- RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for hope? Brown, Martin (NCI)
- Re: RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for ho... ravi narayan
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: technology as a reason for ho... Brown, Martin (NCI)
- RE: Re: technology as a reason for hope? Brown, Martin (NCI)
