>It is true that most of the TW are not part of this global >economy. China is enough to subsidize the US with its low wage >production.... > >Cheers, Anthony The implication is that China would be a richer place if it exported less, and thus subsidized the U.S. less--that each container that leaves Shanghai for Long Beach is a subtraction to Chinese living standards. I cannot see how that could possibly be true... Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Eurocentrism once again Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eurocentrism onceagain Brad DeLong
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eurocentrism onceagai... Max Sawicky
- Eurocentrism once again Brad DeLong
- Re: Eurocentrism once again Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Eurocentrism once again Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Eurocentrism once again Jim Devine
- RE: Eurocentrism once again Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again Anthony DCosta
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again Anthony DCosta
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again Brad DeLong
- Re: RE: Eurocentrism once again Brad DeLong
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eurocentrism onceagai... Max Sawicky
- exploitation of the third by the first Jim Devine
- Eurocentrism once again Brad DeLong
- Re: Eurocentrism once again Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Eurocentrism once again Anthony DCosta
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eurocentrism once again Carrol Cox
