Does anyone have anything intelligent to say about the work by this year's
winners of the so-called "Nobel" prize in economics, i.e.,
John Harsanyi of Berkeley, John Nash (of the famous equilibrium?),
and Reinhard Selden (sp?). What did they contribute? what are the
limitations of their work and the whole game-theoretical perspective?
"What's good for UC-Berkeley is good for civilization."
:-)
in pen-l solidarity,
Jim Devine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ., Los Angeles, CA 90045-2699 USA
310/338-2948 (daytime, during workweek); FAX: 310/338-1950
