Jim D. writes "If forced to choose a meaning, I would see superexploitation in terms of labor-power market structures such as those under apartheid and the like. These non-market impediments ... keep the rate of surplus value from becoming equalized... Does this view of superexploitation mean that there are workers who are miniexploited... Yes it does..." Does this boil down to defining superexploited workers as those who systematically receive less than the value of labor power and observing that some workers receive more than the value of labor power but less than the value they produce. If so, this subsumes Ajit's points and answers Walter's definitional question concisely. Terry McDonough
