I can not think of any revolution that was not a mass democratic
movement, if the meaning of revolution is not conflated with
coup-d'etat, of course!

Mine

it was written:

> mass democratic movement rather than a small group coup d'etat.


>Charles Brown wrote:

>>There is no successful socialism>
>without it eventually being a world revolution. But that doesn't mean 
>that the world revolution starts everywhere at the same time.
>

Reply via email to