Don't take this as an invitation to polemic. What is said below is partially a true comment.. Mine Paul fellow wrote: >Because most all economists are men. And that's because economics is >traditionally patriarchal and consists of the politics of hierarchy and >control, like the military. And most economics jobs are in the >institutions that serve the needs of the state they find themselves in. >That's only natural. Profit uber alles!!! ;-) Economics is not an >objective "science" by any generally accepted definition of science. It >is a tool and a necessary one at that, but it is not inclusive as >political economy, the philosopical field. We should see a lot more real >political economy, and from women. Charlene Spretnak and Carolyn >Merchant didn't have to be ordained economists to contribute valuable >insights in political economy. >--paul *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 5/9/00 at 7:32 PM Raja Abillama wrote: > Why has this forum been so male dominated lately? What ever happened to feminist concerns in IPE? To the articulation of gender relations in IPE? To the diminishing of the phallic in IPE? > >Fu'ad
