In The Closing of the American Mind, of course. ;) --jks In a message dated Thu, 18 May 2000 12:16:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: << Brad De Long wrote: >So why, then, is the first Marx so weak in post-Marxian Marxism? Why >was the world afflicted with, say, Paul Sweezy's claim that "One >need not have a specific idea of a... beautiful musical composition, >to recognize that the... the rock-and-roll that blares at us >exemplify a pattern of utilization of human and material resources >which is inimical to human welfare"? My god. Where did he say that? Doug >>
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleabil... Jim Devine
- Re: Marx and Malleability Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Marx and Malleability JKSCHW
- Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Marx and Malleability Jim Devine
- Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Jim Devine
- Marx & Engels, was Re: Marx and Mallea... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Michael Perelman