> Brad raises an important question about the cultural development > of Soviet-style socialism. It has been noted that there are > parallels between "socialist realism" and the sort of art > promoted under Nazism. This suggests that there is something in > the way totalitarian, or would-be totalitarian, stystems regard > art. A crude first approximation might be that these enshrine the > cultural values of people with middlebrow artistic taste, due to > their, typically, non-elite education and background in the old > society, . . . But this is not unique to totalitarian/authoritarian societies. If Readers' Digest had an art supplement you would find the same stuff there in a patriotic mode. Look at the arguments over the Viet Vets memorial. The common element is rejection of elite and/or less accessible art. mbs
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Michael Perelman
- Re: Marx and Malleability JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Max B. Sawicky
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Jim Devine
- Art, was Re: Marx and Malleability Carrol Cox
- Re: Art, was Re: Marx and Malleability Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Jim Devine
- Re:Marx and Malleability enilsson
