NO. You are creating false dichotomies. Vulgar biological "determinism" is
a already product of vulgar "idealist" mentality, which essentializes,
reifies and idealizes biology..
Mine
>I understand your point about vulgar biological determinism, but to deny
>the
>influence of hormones, etc. is a vulgar idealism.
>Rod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One can not "identify" masculine behavior by looking at the presence or
> absence of reproductive organs..
>
> I think the research is biased for the reasons I mentioned below. It does
> not consider the social factors other than the "family"!
>
> Mine
>
> >It does saying "acting like" anything. It says "identifying as"
>
> >Rod
>
>
--
Rod Hay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The History of Economic Thought Archive
http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html
Batoche Books
http://Batoche.co-ltd.net/
52 Eby Street South
Kitchener, Ontario
N2G 3L1
Canada
