Gerald Levy wrote:
>Doug has condemned Gillott and Kumar's book without reading it or even
>seeing a copy. If what is good for the goose is good for the gander, then
>Doug should not object to others who have not read _Wall Street_ from
>condemning it sight unseen. Perhaps Doug will now admit that his
>"review" of books prior to reading is more than a little problematic and
>speculative?
You're right, Jerry, on the strength of this precedent, I think everyone
should condemn Wall Street sight unseen. Or any other book s/he likes to
hate. It's the holiday season; condemn generously!
Doug
