Gerald Levy wrote:
>As I hinted before, Doug has claimed that the "intelligent use of
>bourgeois statistics" can serve as a substitute for Marxian categories.
Actually I've mostly phrased this as a question, not an assertion, a
question that runs more or less as follows: "What do the Marxian value
categories tell you about recent economic history that the intelligent use
of bourgeois statistics can't?" By intelligent, in this context, I meant
through Marx-informed eyes. I asked because I really want to hear answers,
and not a lot of empty purist bluster.
Doug
