> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 11:18:51 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Camp. Resp. Tech." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Deaths Blamed on IBM--JOIN OUR LIST-SERVE
> 
> >Published Monday, February 23, 1998, in the San Jose Mercury News
> >
> >Deaths blamed on IBM: Its workers allegedly were exposed to cancer-causing
> chemicals.
> >
> >
> >Mercury News Staff Writer
> >
> >Citing a high incidence of cancer among workers at IBM Corp. in San Jose, a
> wrongful death lawsuit filed last week in Santa Clara County Superior Court
> blames the company for exposing employees to fatal levels of cancer-causing
> chemicals since the mid-1960s.
> >
> >   The lawsuit was brought on behalf of the families of five former San
> Jose International Business Machines Corp. workers who have died of cancer,
> as well as four other current or former IBM employees now stricken with the
> disease. In addition to IBM, the suit names as defendants a host of other
> companies responsible for manufacturing the chemicals used by IBM, including
> Shell Oil Co. and Union Carbide Corp.
> >
> >   However, the suit focuses mostly on IBM and whether the company took the
> necessary precautions for employees who worked in ``clean rooms'' and areas
> where disk drives and microcircuitry were manufactured. All the workers
> involved in the court case, including the five who died of cancer -- Michael
> White, John Thomas, Suzanne Rubio, Mose Jefferson and Christopher Corpuz --
> worked in such chemical-filled environments.
> >
> >   ``Motivated by a desire for unwarranted economic gain and profit,
> defendants willfully and recklessly ignored knowledge . . . of the health
> hazards,'' the suit states. ``The objective of these defendants was
> maximizing production, but in doing so, these defendants endangered the
> health, welfare and safety of IBM workers.''
> >
> >   IBM spokeswoman Tara Sexton said Friday the company would have no
> comment because officials had not yet reviewed the suit. In the past, IBM
> and other representatives of the semiconductor industry have defended their
> safety records, denying any link between work conditions and cancer clusters.
> >
> >   IBM has been confronted with similar allegations in recent years as
> current and former IBM chemists and researchers have come forward with
> concerns about what they contend has been a mysterious pattern of cancer
> among certain workers, particularly those toiling in the clean rooms.
> >
> >   A story last year in the Mercury News' West magazine detailed how some
> of these employees have tried to get IBM to examine the issue. For example,
> Gary Adams, a longtime IBM chemist who has fought cancer, alerted the
> company to his concerns as early as the mid-1980s, according to that account.
> >
> >    Adams, a Campbell resident, is not a plaintiff in the Santa Clara
> County lawsuit but has described in detail how IBM colleagues and friends
> contracted cancer over many years. His calls for medical monitoring programs
> were rejected by top IBM officials, who assured him such a program was
> unnecessary.
> >
> >   Another lawsuit involving the IBM safety issue has been pending in New
> York since 1996, when lawyers targeted Union Carbide and other manufacturers
> of the chemicals used by IBM. That suit now involves more than 100
> plaintiffs, including the families of 11 people dead of cancer.
> >
> >   The sweeping suit, known on the East Coast as simply the ``IBM case,''
> attributes a variety of cancers to chemicals used in the semiconductor
> industry, particularly within IBM.
> >
> >   San Jose attorney Amanda Hawes, who has been involved in the massive New
> York case, filed last week's suit in Santa Clara County. She said the case
> is aimed at forcing IBM to correct a long history of health problems for the
> company's workers.
> >
> >   ``It concerns me that given all the technology we have at our
> fingertips, what were they doing with it?'' Hawes said. ``The story about
> the IBM scientists (and cancer) has been out there.''
> >
> >   The suit alleges that IBM has misled its employees for years by assuring
> them that the clean rooms were safe and had been tested for side effects and
> carcinogens. Hawes' court papers maintain IBM has ``no factual basis'' for
> those assertions and never conducted tests to determine whether employees
> were exposed to hazardous chemicals.
> >
> >   The IBM employees involved in the suit held various positions, such as
> researchers and scientists, but all had ``hands-on'' exposure to the
> chemicals, according to Hawes. Some were young when they contracted cancer:
> Suzanne Rubio was 36 when she died of breast cancer.
> >
> >   ``People are told that clean means safe,'' Hawes said of IBM's attitude
> about the clean rooms. ``The average person assumes when they hear that that
> somebody has actually investigated, and (IBM) can't make that showing.''
> >
> >   The suit does not specify a dollar amount but is seeking punitive
> damages against IBM and the chemical makers.
> >
> >
> >1997 - 1998 Mercury Center. The information you receive online from Mercury
> Center is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. 
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >And from Reuters, 
> >
> >
> >CALIFORNIA CANCER VICTIMS SUE IBM
> >
> >07:53 p.m Feb 23, 1998 Eastern
> >
> >SAN JOSE, Calif. (Reuters) - A group of <strong>cancer</strong> victims and
> their families has sued IBM Corp., alleging the computer company's San Jose,
> California, plant exposed employees to fatal levels of cancer-causing
> chemicals for some three decades, a lawyer for the group said  Monday.
> >
> >Amanda Hawes said the suit filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court last
> week also named several other companies that make the chemicals used by
> International Business Machines Corp., including Shell Oil Co.  and Union
> Carbide Corp.
> >
> >The wrongful death suit alleges that IBM ``willfully and recklessly''
> ignored health concerns over chemicals used in ''clean rooms'' where disk
> drives and microcircuitry are manufactured.
> >
> >``Clean doesn't necessarily mean safe,'' said Hawes, who brought the suit
> on behalf of families of five former IBM employees who have died of cancer
> and four more now battling the disease.
> >
> >``The materials used in this industry may be very advanced tech but it
> doesn't mean that they are free of risk to the workers,'' Hawes said.
> ``These are people who always thought they were being totally protected.''
> >
> >Tara Sexton, an IBM spokesperson, said the company did not comment on
> on-going litigation.
> >
> >``IBM has a longstanding commitment to a safe working environment, and
> compliance with all health and safety regulations and laws,'' Sexton said.
> >
> >The suit alleges that IBM did not adequately test the human health effects
> of ``clean room'' chemicals, to which scientists and researchers are exposed
> as part of the manufacturing process.
> >
> >Victims involved in the suit suffered from various types of cancer
> including: melanoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, renal cell cancer, breast cancer
> and cancer of the salivary glands.
> >
> >``These are all relatively young people,'' Hawes said, noting that the suit
> sought punitive damages against IBM and the chemical makers.
> >
> >A separate suit was filed in New York in 1996 aimed at the chemical
> manufacturers, alleging that a wide variety of <strong>cancers</strong>
> could be traced to chemicals used in the semiconductor industry.
> >
> >``It is disturbing that some of these materials are closely guarded trade
> secrets, which is more important than getting to the bottom of their
> potential for human harm,'' Hawes said.
> >
> >Copyright: 1994-98
> >  Infoseek Corporation  All rights reserved.
> >      
> >
> Leslie Byster
> Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition
> 760 N. First Street
> San Jose, CA 95112
> 408-287-6707-phone
> 408-287-6771-fax
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >NOW AVAILABLE AT OUR WEBSITE -- New information about our new book, SACRED
> WATERS:  LIFE-BLOOD OF MOTHER EARTH, Four Case Studies of High-Tech Water
> Exploitation and Corporate Welfare in the Southwest
> >     http://www.svtc.org/svtc/
> >
> >
> 
> 


Reply via email to