> _________________________________________________________________
>  
>                WHAT MADE THE ACTEAL MASSACRE POSSIBLE?
> _________________________________________________________________
>  
>                          By Mumia Abu-Jamal
>                        Column Written 1/10/98
>                     Source: Mumia, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                     - Monday, 19 January 1998 -
>  
>                                 *
>  
>      "Brothers and Sisters;
>      Why?
>      How many more?
>      Until when?"
>      --Subcomandante Marcos
>      Zapatista Army; Dec. 1997
>  
>      The brutal, premeditated massacre of at least 45 indigenous
> poor men, women and children several days before Christmas, 1997,
> by armed paramilitaries of the ruling Institutional Revolutionary
> Party (PRI) sent shock waves through the international community.
>  
>      In a slaughter of the innocent that took over four hours in
> duration, the so-called PRIistas revealed their malevolent
> intent, to attack and disable the indigenous (Indian) support
> network for the Zapatista Army. Thus, the ruthless killing of 45
> civilians had a clear political objective, one verbalized by the
> "Red Mask" paramilitaries as, "We are going to put an end to the
> Zapatista seed" (Nuevo Amanecer Press, 12/26/97). Seen in this
> light, the 45 men, women and children of San Pedro de Chenalho
> were but a means to a dastardly end.
>  
>      How, one wonders, can such a thing happen? Until we address
> this question how can we begin to answer those posed above?
>  
>      For over 50 years, especially after the Nazi period in
> Europe, psychologists have studied this destructive type of
> phenomena.
>  
>      Some, like the famous Milgram Studies (of 1963) taught us of
> the limits of "destructive obedience," where so-called "normal"
> people shocked innocent others up to 450 volts, up to levels
> reading "DANGER: SEVERE SHOCK," only because authority figures
> told them to do so, with 65% obeying to the end (other Milgram
> Studies found over 90% compliance).
>  
>      Scholars H.C. Kelman and V.L. Hamilton have advanced the
> notion of "sanctioned massacres," no stranger to American or
> world history: "within American history, My Lai had its
> precursors in the Philippine war around the turn of the century -
> and in the massacres of American Indians - (o)ne recalls the
> Nazi's "final solution" for European Jews, the massacres and
> deportations of Armenians by Turks, the liquidation of the Kulaks
> and the great purges in the Soviet Union, and more recently the
> massacre in Indonesia and Bangladesh, in Biafra and Burundi, in
> South Africa and Mozambique, in Cambodia and Afghanistan, in
> Syria and Lebanon. (Political Psychology, by N.J. Kressel,
> p.223). In many of those cases, we find the "sanctioning" of
> heinous massacres by authorization, routinization and
> dehumanization.
>  
>      Authorization is when persons in power order or allow
> atrocities to occur in furtherance of political ends.
> Routinization is the internal process by which those authorized
> make it "okay" to do what is an obvious evil, like slaughtering
> babies. Dehumanization is the social and ideological process by
> which a people are projected, perceived, and then treated as
> somehow less than human. In each of the historical instances
> noted above, we have seen these diabolical features at work.
>  
>      It happened in America, where the declaration of
> independence wrote of "merciless Indian savages" and where
> children learned the phrase, "the only good Indian is a dead
> Indian" at and early age. Such a mindset made Wounded Knee an
> historic inevitability. These same features were found in the
> Chiapas area where minions of the state attacked the most
> powerless and the most maligned segment of Mexican society:
> Indians, the indigenous peoples.
>  
>      For centuries they, as well as Africans, have been subjected
> to dehumanization, where, as in Chiapas they were not seen as
> full human beings, with inherent rights, but as tools used in the
> "dirty war" of the government against the Zapatistas.
>  
>      "How many more?," Marcos asked.
>      "Until when?," he wonders.
>  
>      The true shame is that we cannot say.
>  
>      Copyright 1998 Mumia Abu-Jamal. All Rights Reserved.
>  
>                               * * *
>  
>      +:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+
>      +:        A N T I F A   I N F O - B U L L E T I N        :+
>      +:          NEWS * ANALYSIS * RESEARCH * ACTION          :+
>      +:     RESISTING FASCISM    *  BY ALL MEANS NECESSARY!   :+
>      +:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+:+
>  
>         to subscribe e-mail Tom Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  
>           ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++
>    ++++ if you agree copy these 3 sentences in your own sig ++++
>   ++++ see: http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm ++++
> 
> ___________________________________________________
> NUEVO AMANECER PRESS- N.A.P.
> _________________________________
> Non Profit organization translating and distributing information
> in support of the work in defense of human rights.
> General Director: Roger Maldonado-Mexico
> Assistant Director: Susana Saravia (Anibarro)
> Director Spain: Darrin Wood
> 
>                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


Reply via email to