Max brings up an interesting challenge. I disagree with him, but I do not have enough factual evidence to clinch my case. I am sure that the poor are hurt more by pollution than they are helped by the decrease in costs. Any suggestions? -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Max B. Sawicky
- boucher, epi and coal Michael Perelman
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Max B. Sawicky
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Michael Perelman
- Re: boucher, epi and coal michael
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Louis Proyect
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Robin Hahnel
- Re: boucher, epi and coal michael
- Re: boucher, epi and coal R. Anders Schneiderman
- Re: boucher, epi and coal James Devine
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Gar W. Lipow
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Max B. Sawicky
- Re: boucher, epi and coal PJM0930
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Max B. Sawicky
- Re: boucher, epi and coal Thomas Kruse
