At 12:10 15/06/98 -0500, you wrote: >> -Paul Meyer writes: > >> (Personally, I seriously doubt whether epistemology really >> matters.) > >It seems to me that all the epistemological questions that do matter >belong to neuroscience rather than a special study called "epistemology." >Denials that we know are always at some level in bad faith, and >neuroscience takes for granted that we know and tries to answer the >question "How?" > >Carrol ______________ I don't understand what all this means. Why should epistemology belong to neuroscience? And are you saying that whoever questions the claim that "we know" is simply crazy? Cheers, ajit sinha
