Michael Perelman wrote: >Doug, you often use the semi-Marxist measure in your popular writing of >estimating how many hours someone would have to work to buy a particular >commodity. Think of the markups in the following way. Suppose each good >experiences an increased markup, while nominal wages remain unchanged. What >workers end up with shrinks and surplus increases. Maybe I'm just >missing your >point. First, doesn't this theorize the origin of profit in exchange rather than production? And second, how do we go from Nike to "each good"? Don't you have to prove that the markup has increased for all products, not just branded sneakers? Doug
- My Take on Competition Michael Perelman
- Re: My Take on Competition Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: My Take on Competition Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My Take on ... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My Take... Michael Perelman
- Re: My Take on Competition Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: My Take on Competition Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Com... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: My Take on... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My Tak... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: My Take on Competition Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition Doug Henwood
