On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Michael Perelman wrote: > DRAM is not protected by IP. It is regarded as a commodity, like wheat or > soybeans. A processor chip is protected. This may be changing, though -- new and more complex types of DRAM, like Rambus' RDRAM, are indeed protected by IP agreements. Toshiba just paid through the nose to license design tech from Rambus, and Rambus is also suing Hitachi over IP violations. All of which has thoroughly pissed off the biggest DRAM producers around, namely the Taiwanese foundry firms, who are pushing commodity-based SDRAM instead. So maybe there's a kind of, well, dialectic between IP and non-IP here. -- Dennis
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Brands, their m... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Brands, their mater... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Brands, their m... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brands, the... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brands,... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Brands, the... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Brands, their material ... Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: Brands, their mater... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:... Anthony D'Costa
- Re: My Take on Competition Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Compet... Dennis R Redmond
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Compet... michael
- Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition Michael Perelman
- Re: My Take on Competition Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: My Take on Competition Jim Devine
- Re: My Take on Competition Rod Hay
- Re: Re: My Take on Competition Rob Schaap
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competition JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My Take on Competitio... JKSCHW
